By Michael Rosen
Publish 12 months note: First released January 1st 2013
How on the earth did we repair upon our twenty-six letters, what do they truly suggest, and the way did we come to write down them down within the first position?
Michael Rosen takes you on an unforgettable event throughout the historical past of the alphabet in twenty-six bright chapters, fizzing with own anecdotes and engaging evidence. beginning with the mysterious Phoenicians and the way sounds first got here to be written down, he races directly to express how nonsense poems paintings, pins down the unusual tale of okay, lines our 5 misplaced letters and tackles the tyranny of spelling, between many many different issues. His heroes of the alphabet diversity from Edward Lear to Phyllis Pearsall (the inventor of the A-Z), and from the 2 scribes of Beowulf to rappers. every one bankruptcy takes on a distinct topic - no matter if it's codes, umlauts or the writing of dictionaries. Rosen's enthusiasm for letters certainly leaps off the web page, no matter if it's the tale of his lifestyles informed in the course of the typewriters he's owned or a bankruptcy on jokes written in a string of gags and note video games.
This is the e-book for someone who's ever puzzled why Hawaiian simply has a thirteen-letter alphabet or how precisely to put in writing the sound of a wild raspberry.
Read or Download Alphabetical: How Every Letter Tells a Story PDF
Best linguistics books
The concept that of the standard, in addition to such cognates as daily life, usual language and traditional event, has come into unique prominence in late-modern philosophy. Thinkers have hired opposing but similar responses to the suggestion of the standard: medical and phenomenological techniques at the one hand, and at the different, extra casual or perhaps anti-scientific methods.
This quantity bargains a primary survey of initiatives from all over the world that search to enforce Creole languages in schooling. not like past works, this quantity takes a holistic strategy. Chapters speak about the sociolinguistic, academic and ideological context of tasks, coverage advancements and undertaking implementation, improvement and assessment.
British English A to Zed provides readers fast entry to an alphabetical directory of both the millions of "Briticisms" pointed out within the common entries or the correlating "Americanisms" that seem through the e-book. This up to date version positive aspects greater than 5,000 entries, together with new phrases, either formal and slang, and phrases from resources as varied as London companies and Bridget Jones's Diary.
- Understanding Verbal Art: A Functional Linguistic Approach
- Conversational Potawatomi
- A Grammar Book of Finnish
- The Dictionary of Made-Up Languages: From Elvish to Klingon, the Anwa, Reella, Ealray, Yeht (Real) Origins of Invented Lexicons
- Konzepte des Hochdeutschen: Der Sprachnormierungsdiskurs im 18. Jahrhundert (Studia Linguistica Germanica) (German Edition)
Extra info for Alphabetical: How Every Letter Tells a Story
Ii) *naanu nana-ge kai toLedu-koND-e. ’ This would reinforce the view that the dative and possessive positions are independent thematically, and related by coindexing rather than movement. References Amritavalli, R. 1988. ” In Experiencer subjects in South Asian languages, M. K. Verma and K. P. ), 285–95. Stanford: Center for the Study of Language and Information. Amritavalli, R. 1997. ” In Phases and interfaces of morphology, M. Hariprasad, Hemalatha Nagarajan, P. Madhavan and K. G. ), vol.
We shall discuss this in the following section while discussing the behaviour of the genitive in contact situations. Let us ﬁrst observe the distribution of the genitive marker in Goan Konkani. In Goan Konkani the subject is case-marked by the genitive case marker ce/je to express possession and kinship. e. noun-verb combination such as koshish (noun) karnaa (verb) ‘to try’, vaadaa (noun) karnaa (verb) ‘to make a promise’ etc. in Hindi–Urdu). The following examples are illustrative: The genitive ce/je denoting possession in Goan Konkani.
Section 1 of this chapter, in support of degenitivization, discusses those constructions in which convergence leads to: (a) the deletion of the ergative case marker and the consequence of such deletion in Dakkhini; (b) the deletion of the genitive of Hindi–Urdu in Dakkhini; (c) the replacement of the genitive case marker by the dative case marker ku in Dakkhini, and ka in Konkani; (d) the occurrence of an additional genitive case marker as an obligatory marker in inﬁnitival constructions in Dakkhini and Konkani, and (e) the retention of the genitive in a few cases in Konkani and Dakkhini.